journal: Online Media and Global Communication

Open Access Veröffentlicht seit 1. Januar 2022

Online Media and Global Communication

ISSN: 2749-9049

Herausgegeben von: Louisa Ha, Peiqin Chen, Ke Guo

Über diese Zeitschrift

Online Media and Global Communication (OMGC) ist eine neue Zeitschrift für qualitativ hochwertige Artikel über Theorien und Methoden zur Rolle der Online-Medien in der globalen Kommunikation.

Die Zeitschrift wird vom "Center for Global Public Opinion Research of China" und der "School of Journalism and Communication" der "Shanghai International Studies University" in China gesponsert.

Es ist eine Open-Access-Zeitschrift, die in englischer Sprache veröffentlicht wird. Die Zeitschrift dient als Brücke zwischen der dominierenden englischsprachigen Welt und der nicht-englischsprachigen Welt, die aufgrund von Sprachbarrieren in der Forschung über Online-Medien und globale Kommunikation meist unsichtbar geblieben ist.

Durch die strukturierten Zusammenfassungen aller Forschungsartikel und das einheitliche Schlagwortsystem in den sechs offiziellen Sprachen der Vereinten Nationen plus Japanisch und Deutsch (Arabisch, Chinesisch, Englisch, Französisch, Russisch, Spanisch, Japanisch und Deutsch) bietet die Zeitschrift eine leicht zugängliche Plattform für Nutzer weltweit. Das einzigartige zweispurige "single-blind"- und "double-blind"-Verfahren ermöglicht die Begutachtung von Manuskripten mit unterschiedlichen Identitätsebenen.

OMGC veröffentlicht Übersichtsartikel über den aktuellen Stand der Forschung zu Online-Medien und globaler Kommunikation in verschiedenen Ländern und Regionen, Original-Forschungsarbeiten zu Themen im Zusammenhang mit Online-Medien und globaler Kommunikation sowie übersetzte Artikel aus dem nicht-englischsprachigen globalen Süden. Die Zeitschrift ist bestrebt, eine führende Plattform für den wissenschaftlichen Austausch auf dem Gebiet der Online-Medien und der globalen Kommunikation zu sein.

Für Veranstaltungen und mehr, folge uns auf Twitter unter https://twitter.com/OMGCJOURNAL.

Themen

OMGC veröffentlicht qualitativ hochwertige, innovative und originelle Forschungsarbeiten über globale Kommunikation, insbesondere über die Nutzung globaler Online-Medienplattformen wie Facebook, TikTok, YouTube, Twitter, Instagram, WhatsApp, Weibo, WeChat, Wikipedia, Websites, Blogs usw.

Die Zeitschrift befasst sich mit aktuellen Fragen zu den Auswirkungen und der Funktionsweise globaler digitaler Medienplattformen auf die internationalen Beziehungen, die internationale öffentliche Meinung, die Verbreitung von "Fake News" und Propaganda, die Kommunikation in der Diaspora, das Verbraucherverhalten und das Gleichgewicht der Stimmen in der Welt. Länderübergreifende vergleichende Forschung ist besonders willkommen. Empirische Forschung wird gegenüber konzeptionellen Arbeiten bevorzugt.

Kommende Themenhefte

Ideen für Themenhefte sind willkommen, bitte senden Sie Ihren Vorschlag an die Redaktion (OMGC@shisu.edu.cn).

Artikelformate

Neben dem Standardformat für Forschungsartikel bietet die Zeitschrift die folgenden Formate an:

Pro Ausgabe ein übersetzter Artikel aus nicht-englischsprachigen Zeitschriften, die als "Gems from the Global South" von hoher Qualität sind.

Ein Übersichtsartikel pro Ausgabe über den aktuellen Stand der Forschung im Bereich Online-Medien und globale Kommunikation in einem Land oder einer Region.

Ihre Vorteile

Beiträge werden ohne Gebühren für die Autor:innen auf einer professionellen Pubikationsplattform veröffentlicht unter der Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Lizenz (Open Access)
Alle Autor:innen behalten das Copyright, es sei denn, ihr Werk obliegt aufgrund lokaler Gegebenheiten keinem Copyright.
Siebensprachige Zusammenfassungen maximieren die weltweite Sichtbarkeit und Auffindbarkeit: http://omgc.shisu.edu.cn/12335/list.htm
Verbreitung des Autors und des Zeitschriftenartikels sowohl in chinesischen als auch in westlichen sozialen Medien
Ausgewählte veröffentlichte Artikel können ins Chinesische übersetzt und in gedruckter Form veröffentlicht werden
Einhaltung höchster ethischer Standards bei der Begutachtung gemäß den Richtlinien des Ausschusses für Publikationsethik
Manuskript-Reviewer erhalten eine Anerkennung für qualitativ hochwertige und pünktliche Reviews

Geschichte

Launched in January 2022, in collaboration with Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai, China.

Abstracting und Indexing

Online Media and Global Communication ist in den folgenden Services indiziert:

Dimensions
EBSCO Discovery Service
Google Scholar
IAMCR Open Access Journals Directory
J-Gate
JournalTOCs
KESLI-NDSL (Korean National Discovery for Science Leaders)
Linguistics Abstracts Online
MyScienceWork
Naver Academic
Naviga (Softweco)
Primo Central (ExLibris)
ReadCube
Scilit
Semantic Scholar
Summon (ProQuest)
TDNet
WorldCat (OCLC)
X-MOL
Yewno Discover

Zusatzmaterial

Fachgebiete

Externe Links

Online Submission of Manuscripts

Band 1 Heft 3

September 2022

Öffentlich zugänglich 6. Oktober 2022

Frontmatter

Seiten: i-ii

PDF downloaden

Editorial

Open Access 12. September 2022

Creation, curation and correction of misinformation and global communication

Louisa Ha

Seiten: 465-468

PDF downloaden

Research Articles

Open Access 16. September 2022

Biased, not lazy: assessing the effect of COVID-19 misinformation tactics on perceptions of inaccuracy and fakeness

Stephanie Jean Tsang

Seiten: 469-496

Mehr PDF downloaden

Abstract

Purpose In light of the fact that people have more opportunities to encounter scientific misinformation surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic, this research aimed to examine how different types of misinformation impact readers’ evaluations of messages and to identify the mechanisms (motivated reasoning hypothesis vs. classical reasoning theory) underlying those evaluations of message inaccuracy and fakeness. Design/methodology/approach This research employed data from an online experiment conducted in Hong Kong in March 2022, when the fifth COVID-19 wave peaked. The data were collected using quota sampling established by age based on census data ( N = 835). Findings In general, the participants were not able to discern manipulated content from misinterpreted content. When given a counter-attitudinal message, those who read a message with research findings as supporting evidence rated the message as being more inaccurate and fake than those who read the same message but with quotes as supporting evidence. Contrary, one’s disposition to engage in analytical thinking and reasoning was not found to impact assessments of information inaccuracy and fakeness. Implications With respect to the debate about whether people are susceptible to misinformation because of cognitive laziness or because they want to protect their personal beliefs, the findings provide evidence of the motivated reasoning hypothesis. Media literacy programs should identify strategies to prepare readers to be attentive to personal biases on information processing. Originality/value Although many researchers have attempted to identify the mechanisms underlying readers’ susceptibility to misinformation, this research makes a distinction between misinterpreted and manipulated content. Furthermore, although the Cognitive Reflection Test is widely studied in the Western context, this research tested this disposition in Hong Kong. Future research should continue to empirically test the effects of different types of misinformation on readers and develop distinct strategies in response to the diverse effects found.

Open Access 16. September 2022

Topic and sentiment analysis of responses to Muslim clerics’ misinformation correction about COVID-19 vaccine: Comparison of three machine learning models

Md Enamul Kabir

Seiten: 497-523

Mehr PDF downloaden

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this research was to use develop a sentiment model using machine learning algorithms for discerning public response about the misinformation correction practices of Muslim clerics on YouTube. Method This study employed three machine learning algorithms, Naïve Bayes, SVM, and a Balanced Random Forest to build a sentiment model that can detect Muslim sentiment about Muslim clerics’ anti-misinformation campaign on YouTube. Overall, 9701 comments were collected. An LDA-based topic model was also employed to understand the most expressed topics in the YouTube comments. Results The confusion matrix and accuracy score assessment revealed that the balanced random forest-based model demonstrated the best performance. Overall, the sentiment analysis discovered that 74 percent of the comments were negative, and 26 percent were positive. An LDA-based topic model also revealed the eight most discussed topics associated with ten keywords in those YouTube comments. Practical implications The sentiment and topic model from this study will particularly help public health professionals and researchers to better understand the nature of vaccine misinformation and hesitancy in the Muslim communities. Social implications This study offers the joint task force of Muslim clerics and medical professionals, and the future misinformation campaigns a sentiment detection model to understand public attitude to such practices on social media. Originality While the impact of misinformation on public sentiment and opinion on social media has been researched extensively, Muslim perspectives on combating misinformation have received less attention. This research is the first to evaluate responses towards Muslim clerics correcting religious vaccine misinformation using machine learning models.

Open Access 14. September 2022

A duality of belief in conspiracy theories amplification: how active communicative actions work differently by trust in the Trump and Biden administrations

Hyelim Lee, Loarre Andreu Perez, Jeong-Nam Kim

Seiten: 524-550

Mehr PDF downloaden

Abstract

Purpose The digital setting empowers users to actively engage in communicative actions. The problem is that this active communication can increase misjudgment in determining the facts around social issues. When this communication is integrated with partisan biases, the effects can be particularly detrimental. Our study tested whether active communication actions regarding social issues and different trust levels toward presidential administrations (Trump vs. Biden) would increase belief in conspiracy theories. Design/methodology/approach To examine this, the study used online survey datasets (Amazon Mechanical Turk, N = 1355) collected during July and August 2021 concerning three political issues: the Afghanistan issue, the Black Lives Matter issue, and the Voter Fraud issue. Findings The findings show that among participants with more active communication actions, the higher Trump government trust is and the lower Biden government trust is, the more belief in conspiracy theories increases. Interestingly, interaction effects of trust in government and active communicative actions were found among both Trump and Biden supporters. Practical/Social Implications Combined with preexisting efforts to tackle misinformation online, there are extensive efforts underway to educate laypeople about the dangers of misinformation. People must understand that any person could fall into belief in conspiracy theories if they do not carefully diagnose their information behaviors. Originality/Value Our study can increase knowledge about people’s situational belief in conspiracy theories based on their political stance. The study can support future research, promoting a deeper understanding of belief in conspiracy theories.

Open Access 23. September 2022

The mediating role of comments’ credibility in influencing cancer cure misperceptions and social sharing

Juan Liu, Carrie Reif-Stice, Bruce Getz

Seiten: 551-579

Mehr PDF downloaden

Abstract

Purpose The rise of fake news is an increasing issue for cancer patients. Specifically, the use of cannabis as a cure for cancer is the most shared social media content regarding alternative cancer treatments (Shi, Siyu, Arthur R. Brant, Aaron Sabolch & Erqi Pollom. 2019. False news of a cannabis cancer cure. Cureus 11(1). e3918. DOI:10.7759/cureus.3918). To better understand the relationship between fake news, perceived credibility, social sharing, and belief in health misinformation, we conducted an online experiment in the United States to explore how people react to fake cancer news on Facebook. Design/methodology/approach A four-condition between-subjects online experiment was conducted to examine whether the perceived credibility of information and comments serve as mediating factors to influence misperceptions and social sharing of cancer misinformation. Findings We find that it is the comments’ credibility rather than information credibility that acts as a mediator between the effects of exposure to variations of comments on cancer treatment misperceptions and social sharing intentions. Practical implications Our study provides important insights into correcting health misinformation on social media. Findings demonstrate the importance of healthcare professionals and organizations engaging with misleading and potentially harmful misinformation posted. Additionally, practitioners need to provide training to enhance individuals’ media literacy to better discern credible health information from misinformation on social media. Value The study advances prior misinformation correction and credibility literature. Theoretically, we find that perceived comments’ credibility act as a mediator in mitigating the spread of fake news. Furthermore, exposure to variations of corrective comments (vs. peers’ supportive comments) increased cancer cure misperceptions via comments’ credibility, a backfire effect indicating that cancer cure misperceptions persisted, were complicated, and difficult to correct.

Open Access 19. September 2022

Can older people stop sharing? An ethnographic study on fake news and active aging in Brazil

Marilia Duque, Luiz Peres-Neto

Seiten: 580-599

Mehr PDF downloaden

Abstract

Purpose An association between age and misinformation is frequently found in literature, which contributes to a moral panic about older people’s participation in the dissemination of fake news. This qualitative study adds context to this discussion by investigating why older people are motivated to engage with online information and why sharing matters in old age. Design/methodology/approach A 16-month ethnographic study was conducted with a group of older adults in São Paulo, Brazil. Participant observation was complemented by in-depth interviews in order to approach participant strategies to evaluate online content and health information. Findings Participants were connected in multiple WhatsApp groups in which they shared content associated with active aging. Sharing helped them to craft their identity as third-agers at the same time that their work as curators was motivated by the local work-oriented ethics. An indirect system of influences impacted the participants’ decisions to trust and share content. Content was evaluated based on long-term interpersonal trust, while health information was validated by expertise in the healthcare area. “Doctor friends” provided medical guidance by warming the health information that the participants found online. Practical implication Regardless of their level of education, older adults need expert friends to warm health information. This dependency impacts active aging and challenges the idea that the internet could empower health decision-making. Social implications This study provides information for policymakers and industries to understand how older adults can access health information and obtain medical guidance. Originality/value This paper shows how sharing behavior can be influenced by local cultural contexts and contributes to mitigating the causal association between age and fake news.

Open Access 14. September 2022

Fact-checking initiatives in Portuguese language countries: checking methods and financing strategies

Lucas Durr Missau, Laura Strelow Storch

Seiten: 600-625

Mehr PDF downloaden

Abstract

Purpose Fact-checking has been changing in recent years from an initial stage in which fact-checkers were more concerned with political discourse to a stage in which combating misinformation becomes the primary purpose. This work examines more closely the standardizing and the customizing aspects of active fact-checking outlets in Portuguese-speaking countries, focusing on the verification methods and organizational models in use. Design/methodology/approach Based on Content Analysis, we collected manually 318 posts during June 2019 from each fact-checking outlets website and then examined each post according to six general concepts: discourse, sources, context, classification, graphic representation, and financing. There were 15 active fact-checking outlets in Brazil (13) and Portugal (2). No active outlets were found in the African countries. Findings Although there is room for inventiveness in fact-checking practices, it is restricted to the classification models adopted and the graphic representation demanded by them. Only two largest Portuguese-speaking countries (Brazil and Portugal) have active fact-checking initiatives during the study period. In Mozambique, we found the outlet named Mozcheck that was inactive with no published content during the research period. From our analysis, we detected a pattern between the type of misinformation and the media to which it is most often linked: false information was circulated mainly in texts, while false contexts were mainly circulated in videos and images led to more manipulated content. In addition, in relation to the sources used to verification of the content, we noticed a large volume of posts relied only on sources came from contacts with press offices – this was especially true for political issues. Practical implications The analyzed data indicates that the standardization tendencies are related to the connection of these initiatives with traditional media. While the contrasting aspects of the fact-checking practices are related to the classification models and the graphic representation created by the outlets. Social implications It indicates that fact-checking outlets is still tied to traditional media in terms of its organizational and institutional business model. Inventiveness and innovation are restricted to the practice of fact-checking conducted by journalists and other professionals. Originality/value This is the first study to compare the practice of fact-checking in Portuguese-speaking countries and, besides looking at aspects of journalistic practice, it also seeks to analyze organizational elements of fact-checking outlets.

Review Article

Open Access 16. September 2022

Online media and global communication research in Nigeria

Eserinune McCarty Mojaye, Oludare Ebenezer Ogunyombo

Seiten: 626-647

Mehr PDF downloaden

Abstract

The growth of global online media necessitates a better knowledge of how these media affect the world. Communication researchers have examined how rhetoric and globalization interact dynamically; how information spreads through cross-cultural interactions, and how a growing global media landscape affects culture, society, economy, and politics. However, no study has aggregated the areas of focus of such studies in order to establish a trend of the discussion of online media and global communication scholarship in Nigeria. In this essay, we offer a pathway for understanding approaches to scholarship in online media and global communication in Nigeria. We review all articles on online media and global communication that were published in two Nigerian academic journals, The Nigerian Journal of Communication and the Journal of Communication and Media Research between 2015 and 2021 using our content categories of authorship, theory/theories used, study population, method of study and research focus. We found that social media, which has proved to be a very hot area of research among scholars worldwide, also occupied the pride of place among Nigerian scholars and that collaboration in research, which is a major way of growing and advancing knowledge, was also significantly common among Nigerian communication researchers. On the low side, however, we found, among others, that lack of funding was a major issue in Nigerian communication research as none of the 73 articles that we analyzed was funded.

Gem from the Global South

Open Access 28. September 2022

Disinformation, hoaxes, curation and verification: review of studies in Ibero-America 2017-2020

Javier Guallar, Lluís Codina, Pere Freixa, Mario Pérez-Montoro

Seiten: 648-668

Mehr PDF downloaden

Abstract

The objective of this article is to carry out a review of disinformation research in the Ibero-American area between 2017 and 2020. To do this, American Psychological Association standards for social scientific reviews are followed and about 60 papers published in indexed journals in Ibero-America are analyzed, as well as published books on the subject. The results are shown grouped into three parts. First, the three fundamental concepts related to disinformation are reviewed: the term of disinformation itself, as well as post-truth and infodemic. Second, the main disinformation products are studied: fake news, information disorders and hoaxes, according to their types, themes, formats, and channels. In the third part, the main strategies against disinformation are presented, reviewing the published works of two of them: content curation and fact checking. The most notable authors, by quantity of research, on the subject are Magallón-Rosa with 6 works, Ufarte-Ruiz with 4 and García-Marín with 3 works. Likewise, the studies by Dolors Palau-Sampio (2018. Fact-checking y vigilancia del poder: La verificación del discurso público en los nuevos medios de América Latina [Fact-checking and surveillance of power: The verification of public discourse in Latin America’s new media]. Communication & Society 31(3). 347–365), Ángel Vizoso & Jorge Vázquez-Herrero (2019. Plataformas de fact checking en español. Características, organización y método [Fact checking platforms in Spanish. Characteristics, organization and method]. Communication & Society 32(1). 127–144), and Carlos Rodríguez-Pérez (2019. No diga fake news, di desinformación: Una revisión sobre el fenómeno de las noticias falsas y sus implicaciones [Don’t say fake news, say disinformation: A review of the fake news phenomenon and its implications]. Comunicación 40. 65–74), can be highlighted for their analysis of disinformation in the Ibero-American area; for their analysis of the typologies of hoaxes the work of Ramón Salaverría, Nataly Buslón, Fernando López-Pan, Bienvenido León, Ignacio López-Goñi & María-Carmen Erviti (2020. Desinformación en tiempos de pandemia: tipología de los bulos sobre la covid-19 [Disinformation in times of pandemic: Typology of Covid-19 hoaxes]. El profesional de la información 29(3). e290315) and for the proposals on curation the works of López-Borrull with collaborators. Conclusions include that the phenomenon of disinformation is highly polyhedral, but society has instruments to deal with it, such as curation and verification (fact checking).

Ahead-of-Print / Just-Accepted

Ahead-of-Print / Just-Accepted

Band 1 (2022)

Für diese Zeitschrift sind keine Journal Metrics verfügbar.

Einreichen

Preparing your manuscript

Before submitting your manuscript to Online Media and Global Communication, please ensure you have read the Objective to make sure that the topic of your contribution is relevant to this journal and follow the guideline below:

Author Submission Guideline:

1. Publication Ethics
The journal will follow the Committee on Publication Ethics guideline for both reviewers and the authors, see https://publicationethics.org/.

2. Original Submissions
All unsolicited authors’ submissions must be original and have not been published in English or other languages, either in print or online publications. Manuscripts which have been posted online such as university web sites, in preprint servers or file-sharing sites must self-identify such posting in the cover letter and undergo single-masked review.

3. Submission procedure
Authors are welcome to submit abstracts to the editor to determine the appropriateness of the manuscript before submitting the full-length manuscript to our journal e-mail: omgc@shisu.edu.cn. Submit the full manuscript to our ScholarOne platform at: https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/omgc.

4. Cover Letter
All new submissions must include a cover letter explaining whether the manuscript is the first time the dataset was being used. If not, then the author should report previous articles or submissions to other journals using the same dataset and explaining the advancement of knowledge of the submitted manuscript over previous articles and other manuscripts under review in other journals.

5. Abstracts and keywords
Manuscripts must include a structured abstract no longer than 300 words in total (purpose, method, findings, implications, value) and proper keywords to help identify appropriate reviewers, see example. Citations in the abstract should be avoided; if essential, they must be listed in full in parentheses. Up to eight keywords can be accepted. The keywords must include country/region of study, research method, and the name of the online media platform being studied such as YouTube or category such as social media.

6. Dual Track Review
This journal adopts a dual track review system as the first in the field of communication. Two review tracks are offered to the authors and authors must choose either one before final submission: 1) double blind (masked) review track that both authors and reviewers do not know the identity of the author; 2) single blind (masked) review track that reviewers will know the identity of the author and the authors are free to cite their own works and refer to themselves in the manuscript. Submitters who have posted their manuscript or its earlier version elsewhere online or with more than five self-citations will undergo the review process using the single-blind review track. All original submissions are in English with reviews by two or more reviewers.

6. Citing your own works
When authors choose double-masked review track, excessive self-citations (more than 5) are discouraged and will be viewed as an attempt to identify the author. Such manuscript will undergo single-masked review automatically. Authors going through a double-masked review track who need to cite their own previous works should cite them in the same way as other authors. There is no need to specify the work is written by the author. The only exceptions are in press or forthcoming articles. In those cases, the in-text reference should be (Authors, in press/forthcoming). In single-masked review track, authors are free to cite and refer to their own works in the text of the manuscript and there is no limit on self-citations as long as they are appropriate.

7. Citation style
The journal follows the De Gruyter Mouton Journal Style Sheet and publishes in American English. This means that in the reference section, authors are required to provide the full name of each cited author such as Chen, Daiwen and Kaoqiu Lu (2020), instead of initials, to help identify authors in non-English speaking countries who have little differentiation by last name. For translated references, only retain the title in the original language, followed by the English title in square brackets, e.g.: Si, Ruo & Jingchao Zhao. 2019. 融媒时代纪实性视听作品创新模式研究 [Research on the innovative mode of documentary audio-visual works in the era of media convergence]. Modern Communication (Journal of Communication University of China) 41(3). 116–121.

The Shanghai International Studies University web page link in English is http://en.shisu.edu.cn/. We also have a journal specific web page, http://omgc.shisu.edu.cn/12332/list.htm, which covers events organized by the journal and other news.

Your benefits of publishing with us

High quality peer-reviewing
Open access publication under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
History of submission and acceptance listed in the published article
Every article easily discoverable because of Search Engine Optimization (SEO) and comprehensive abstracting and indexing services
Multi-lingual abstracts for maximum worldwide visibility
Secure archiving by De Gruyter and the independent archiving service Portico
Professional sales and marketing activities

Please note

Before submitting your article, please have a look at our Publication Ethics Statement and our License to Publish, which must be agreed with before publication
Do not submit work that has been submitted elsewhere or has been published previously
All initial submissions are checked for plagiarism via Crossref Similarity Check
Manuscripts must be written in clear and concise English
A Research Article should normally be no more than 8,000 words in text in English

If you have any general questions please visit our FAQ page for authors

We look forward to receiving your manuscript!

Editorial

Editor-in-Chief
Louisa Ha (Bowling Green State University, USA)

Co Editors-in-Chief
Ke Guo (Shanghai International Studies University, China)
Peiqin Chen (Shanghai International Studies University, China)

Associate Editors
Yining Yan (Shanghai International Studies University, China)
Ji Pan (Fudan University, China)

Managing Editor
Xiaomeng Li (Shanghai International Studies University, China)
E-mail: omgc@shisu.edu.cn

Translation Coordinator and Editor
Gefei Suo (Shanghai International Studies University, China)

Copy Editor
Dane Claussen (Non-Profit Sector News, U.S.A.)

Editorial Board
Mohammad H. Abuljadail, King Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia
Svetlana S. Bodrunova, St. Petersburg State University, Russia
Jason Cabañes, De La Salle University- Manila, The Philippines
Teresa Correa, Diego Portales University-Santiago, Chile
Afonso De Albuquerque, Fluminense Federal University, Brazil
Jeroen de Kloet, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Marton Demeter, National University of Public Service, Hungary
Mohan Dutta, Massey University, New Zealand
Shahira Fahmy, American University at Cairo, Egypt
Terry Flew, University of Sydney, Australia
Michal Glowacki University of Warsaw, Poland
Homero Gil de Zuniga, University of Salamanca, Spain & Pennsylvania State University
Dan Hallin, University of California-San Diego, U.S.A.
Mei-Ling Hsu, National Chengchi University, Taiwan
Kioko Ireri, United States International University-Kenya
Jaemin Jung, Korea Advanced Institute of Technology, South Korea
Veronika Karnowski, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany
Nete Kristensen, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
Rich Ling, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
Jörg Matthes, University of Vienna, Austria
Hang Min, Tsinghua University, China
Bahiyah Omar, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia
Didem Özkul, Bilkent University, Turkey
Victor Manuel Garcia Perdomo, Universidad de La Sabana, Colombia
Ivanka Pjesivac, University of Georgia, U.S.A.
Bushra Hameedur Rahman, University of Punjab-Lahore, Pakistan
Jiro Takai, Nagoya University, Japan
Hong Vu, University of Kansas, U.S.A.
Herman Wasserman, University of Cape Town, South Africa
Oscar Westlund, Oslo Metropolitan University, Norway & University of Gothenburg, Sweden
Lars Willnat, Syracuse University, U.S.A.
Xiaoling Zhang, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, China

(English)

Typ: Zeitschrift
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: De Gruyter Mouton
Erstveröffentlichung: 1. Januar 2022
Erscheinungsweise: 4 Hefte pro Jahr
Zielgruppe: Scholars in Communication, Media Studies, Internet Studies, International Studies, International Relations