Accuracy of Various Methods to Estimate Volume and Weight of Symmetrical and Non-Symmetrical Fruits using Computer Vision

Authors

  • Hurriyatul Fitriyah Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Brawijaya, Jalan Veteran 8 Malang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5614/itbj.ict.res.appl.2022.16.3.2

Keywords:

conical frustum, estimation, fruits, regression, solid of revolution

Abstract

Many researchers have used images to measure the volume and weight of fruits so that the measurement can be done remotely and non-contact. There are various methods for fruit volume estimation based on images, i.e., Basic Shape, Solid of Revolution, Conical Frustum, and Regression. The weight estimation generally uses Regression. This study analyzed the accuracy of these methods. Tests were done by taking images of symmetrical fruits (represented by tangerines) and non-symmetrical fruits (represented by strawberries). The images were processed using segmentation in saturation color space to get binary images. The Regression method used Diameter, Projection Area, and Perimeter as features that were extracted from the binary images. For symmetrical fruits, the best accuracy was obtained with the Linear Regression based on Diameter (LDD), which gave the highest R2 (0.96 for volume and 0.93 for weight) and the lowest RMSE (5.7 mm3 for volume and 5.3 gram for volume). For non-symmetrical fruits, the highest accuracy for non-symmetric fruits was given by the Linear Regression based on Diameter (LRD) and Linear Regression based on Area (LRA) with an R2 of 0.8 for volume and weight. The RMSE for LRD and LRA for strawberries was 3.3 mm3 for volume and 1.4 grams for weight.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

OECD, International Standards for Fruit and Vegetables, Paris, OECD Publishing, 2011.

National Standardization Agency of Indonesia, SNI Tangerine, 3165:2009, 2009. (Text in Indonesian)

Jarimopas, B., Nunak, T. & Nunak, N., Electronic Device for Measuring Volume of Selected Fruit and Vegetables, Postharvest Biology and Technology, 35(1), pp. 25-31, Jan. 2005.

Concha-Meyer, A., Eifert, J., Wang, H. & Sanglay, G., Volume Estimation of Strawberries, Mushrooms and Tomatoes with a Machine Vision System, International Journal of Food Properties, 21(1), pp. 1867-1874, Aug. 2018.

Hu, M.-H., Dong, Q.-L., Malakar, P.K., Liu, B.L. & Jaganathan, G.K., Determining Banana Size Based on Computer Vision, International Journal of Food Properties, 18(3), pp. 508-520, Dec. 2015.

de Luna, R., Dadios, E.P., Bandala, A.A. & Vicerra, R.R.P., Size Classification of Tomato Fruit Using Thresholding, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning Techniques, Agrivita, Journal of Agricultural ScienceAgrivita, 41(3), Oct. 2019.

Ercisli, S., Sayinci, B., Kara, M., Yildiz, C. & Ozturk, I., Determination of Size and Shape Features of Walnut (Juglans Regia L.) Cultivars Using Image Processing, Scientia Horticulturae, 133, pp. 47-55, Jan. 2012.

Bargoti, S. & Underwood, J.P., Image Segmentation for Fruit Detection and Yield Estimation in Apple Orchards, Journal of Field Robotic, 34(6), pp. 1039-1060, Oct. 2017.

Venkatesh, G.V., Md. Iqbal, S., Gopal, A. & Ganesan, D., Estimation of Volume and Mass of Axi-symmetric Fruits using Image Processing Technique, International Journal of Food Properties, 18(3), pp. 608-626, Dec. 2014.

Teerachaichayut, S., Yokswad, S., Terdwongworakul, A., Jannok, P. & Fernandes, S.V., Application of Image Analysis for Determination of Mangosteen Density, Journal of Advanced Agricultural Technologies, 2(2), pp. 92-97, Dec. 2015.

Cortes, D.F.M., Catarina, R.S., Barros, G.B. d. A., Ares, F.A.S., da Silveira S.F., Ferreguetti, G.A., Ramos, H.C.C., Viana, A.P. & Pereiral, M.G., Model-Assisted Phenotyping by Digital Images in Papaya Breeding Program, Scientia Agricola, 74(4), pp. 294-302, Aug. 2017.

Ibrahim, M.F., Ahmad Saad, F., Zakaria, A. & md Shakaff, A.Y., In-Line Sorting of Harumanis Mango based on External Quality using Visible Imaging, Sensors, 16(11), Oct. 2016.

Rashidi, M., Seyfi, K. & Gholami, M., Determination of Kiwi Fruit Volume Using Image Processing, ARPN Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science, 2(6), pp. 17-22, Jan. 2007.

Koc, A.B., Determination of Watermelon Volume Using Ellipsoid Approximation and Image Processing, Postharvest Biology, and Technology, 45(3), pp. 366-371, Jan. 2007.

Omid, M., Khojastehnazhand, M. & Tabatabaeefar, A., Estimating Volume and Mass of Citrus Fruits by Image Processing Technique, Journal of Food Engineering, 100(1), pp. 315-321, Sept. 2010.

Sabliov, C.M., Boldor, D., Keener, K.M. & Farkas, B.E., Image Processing Method to Determine Surface Area and Volume of Axi-symmetric Aggricultural Products, International Journal of Food Properties, 5(3), pp. 641-653, Feb. 2002.

Costa, A.G., Elisgela, R., Braga, R.A. & Pinto, F.A., Measurement of Volume of Macaw Palm Fruit Using Traditional and the Digital MoirTechniques, Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrola e Ambiental, 20(2), pp. 152-157, Feb. 2016.

Ponce Real, J., Aquino, A., Millan, B. & Andujar Marquez, J., Automatic Counting and Individual Size and Mass Estimation of Olive-Fruits through Computer Vision Techniques, IEEE Access, 7(1), pp. 59451-59465, May. 2019.

Ashtiani, S.-H.M., Motie, J.B., Emadi, B. & Aghkhani, M.-H. Models for Predicting the Mass of Lime Fruits by Some Engineering Properties, Journal of Food Science Technology, 51(11), pp. 3411-3417, Nov. 2014.

Font, D., Tresanchez, M., Martez, D., Moreno, J., Clotet, E. & Palacin, J., Vineyard Yield Estimation Based on the Analysis of High-Resolution Images Obtained with Artificial Illumination at Night, Sensors, 15(4), pp. 8284-8301, Apr. 2015.

Li, B., Cockerton, H.M., Johnson, A.W., Karlstr, A., Stavridou, E., Deakin, G. & Harrison, R. J. Defining Strawberry Shape Uniformity Using 3D Imaging and Genetic Mapping. Horticulture Research, 7(115). Aug. 2020.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-27

How to Cite

Fitriyah, H. (2022). Accuracy of Various Methods to Estimate Volume and Weight of Symmetrical and Non-Symmetrical Fruits using Computer Vision. Journal of ICT Research and Applications, 16(3), 210-225. https://doi.org/10.5614/itbj.ict.res.appl.2022.16.3.2