cookies to track usage and preferences." data-cookieaccepttext="I Understand" data-cookiedeclinetext="Disable Cookies" data-cookiepolicytext="Privacy Policy">
1981
Volume 7, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2206-5857
  • E-ISSN: 2206-5857

Abstract

This article offers new learnings and recommended practices for documentary-centred grassroots engagement and social change research. These learnings were developed through a community engagement effort in 2020 that centred around a documentary film about racial violence and injustice, . Shaped by extended dialogues with industry experts, the filmmaker, local community organizations and more than 100 community participants, these learnings should be of interest to researchers, media makers, organizers, activists, and engagement specialists who wish to engage publics in critical social justice conversations that are not possible through traditional top-down, externally driven methods and engagement approaches alone. Organized around an urgent question – ‘How can participatory methods shift how media is employed and researched for social change purposes?’ – this article responds to a recent call for researchers to avoid ‘re-inventing the wheel’ and to align new work with existing knowledge produced in the field of communication for social change and the long-tradition of community engagement work in the field of documentary.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Independent Television Service (ITVS)
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jacm_00102_1
2022-04-01
2022-12-31
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aguayo, A. J.. ( 2013;), ‘ Paradise lost and found: Popular documentary, collective identification and participatory media culture. ’, Studies in Documentary Film, 7:3, pp. 23348.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anon. ( 2020a;), community conversation. , Durham, NC:, February.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Anon. ( 2020b;), community conversation. , Concord, NH:, February.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Anon. ( 2020c;), community conversation. , Albuquerque, NM:, February.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Anon. ( 2020d;), community conversation. , Bristol, TN:, February.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Borum Chattoo, C.. ( 2020), Story Movements: How Documentaries Empower People and Inspire Social Change, New York:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Borum Chattoo, C., and Feldman, L.. ( 2017;), ‘ Storytelling for social change: Leveraging documentary and comedy for public engagement in global poverty. ’, Journal of Communication, 67, pp. 678701.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cerqueira da Conceição, E.,, Gomes de Moura, L. E.,, Freitas, C., and Sartoretto, P.. ( 2020;), ‘ Our collective narrative was being constructed in the film production: A conversation at the crossroads between militants, media production and research. ’, Commons: Revista de Comunicación y Ciudadanía Digital, 9:2, pp. 186210.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cizek, K., and Uricchio, W.. ( 2019), Collective Wisdom: Co-Creating Media within Communities, across Disciplines and with Algorithms, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;, https://wip.mitpress.mit.edu/collectivewisdom. Accessed 8 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Conrad-Pérez, D.,, Borum, C., and Aufderheide, P.. ( 2020), Breaking the Silence: How Documentaries Can Shape the Conversation on Racial Violence in America and Create New Communities, Washington, DC:: CMSI;, https://cmsimpact.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/CMSI_ITVS_Report_web.pdf. Accessed 8 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Driver, S.. ( 2020;), ‘ Beyond inclusion: The critical role of people of color in the U.S. documentary ecosystem. ’, Ford Foundation, September, https://www.fordfoundation.org/media/5719/beyond-inclusion-public-paper-lm04-1.pdf. Accessed 8 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Forde, S.. ( 2011), Challenging the News: The Journalism of Alternative and Community Media, Basingstoke:: Palgrave;.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Freire, P.. ( 1970), Pedagogy of the Oppressed, New York:: Herder & Herder;.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Freire, P.. ( 1972), Cultural Action for Freedom, Harmondsworth:: Penguin Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Lennie, J., and Tacchi, J.. ( 2013), Evaluating Communication for Development: A Framework for Social Change, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Manyozo, L.. ( 2012), People’s Radio: Communicating Change across Africa, Penang:: Southbound;.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Nash, K., and Corner, J.. ( 2016;), ‘ Strategic impact documentary: Contexts of production and social intervention. ’, European Journal of Communication, 31:3, pp. 22742.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Obregon, R., and Mosquera, M.. ( 2005;), ‘ Participatory and cultural challenges for research and practice in health communication. ’, in H. Oscar,, T. Thomas, and E. T. Hylland. (eds), Media and Global Change: Rethinking Communication for Development, Buenos Aires:: CLACSO;, pp. 23346.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Pinderhughes, E.,, Jackson, V., and Romney, P.. (eds) ( 2017), Understanding Power: An Imperative for Human Services, Washington, DC:: NASW Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Quarry, W., and Ramirez, R.. ( 2009), Communication for Another Development: Listening before Telling, London:: Zed Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Rodríguez, C.,, Ferron, B., and Shamas, K.. ( 2014;), ‘ Four challenges in the field of alternative, radical and citizens’ media research. ’, Media, Culture & Society, 36:2, pp. 15066.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Sherman, A.. ( 1980;), ‘ Two views of emotion in the writings of Paulo Freire. ’, Education Theory, 30:1, pp. 3538.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Smith, S. L.,, Choueiti, M.,, Choi, A., and Pieper, K.. ( 2019;), Inclusion in the Director’s Chair: Gender, Race, & Age of Directors across 1,200 Top Films from 2007 to 2018. , Los Angeles, CA:: USC Annenberg Inclusion Initiative;, http://assets.uscannenberg.org/docs/inclusion-in-the-directors-chair-2019.pdf. Accessed 8 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Suzina, A. C.,, Tufte, T., and Jiménez-Martínez, C.. ( 2020;), ‘ Contemporary reflections on participatory communication and civil society development in Brazil and beyond. ’, International Communication Gazette, Special Issue: ‘The Legacy of Paulo Freire’, 82:5, pp. 40710.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Tachhi, J.,, Watkins, J., and Keerthirathne, K.. ( 2009;), ‘ Participatory content creation: Voice, communication, and development. ’, Development in Practice, 19:4&5, pp. 57384.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Tufte, T., and Gumucio-Dagron, A.. (eds) ( 2006), Communication for Social Change Anthology: Historical and Contemporary Readings, South Orange, NJ:: Communication for Social Change Consortium;.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Tufte, T.,, Jiménez-Martínez, C., and Suzina, A. C.. ( 2020;), ‘ De-constructing participatory communication and civil society development in 2020: A perspective inspired by Paulo Freire. ’, Commons: Revista de Comunicación y Ciudadanía Digital, 9:2, pp. 4878.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. White, T.. ( 2020;), ‘ On the path to a new ethical framework in the documentary practice. ’, Documentary Magazine, 21 October, https://www.documentary.org/online-feature/path-new-ethical-framework-documentary-practice. Accessed 8 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Conrad-Pérez, David,, Borum, Caty,, Olive, Jacqueline,, Flick Wilson, Lisa,, Jackson, Vanessa, and Brooks Jones, Shakita. ( 2022;), ‘ Breaking cultures of silence: Learnings from a participatory community-centred approach to leveraging and researching documentaries for social change. ’, Journal of Alternative & Community Media, 7:1, pp. 322, https://doi.org/10.1386/jacm_00102_1
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/jacm_00102_1
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error